tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6536854065433425156.post2596124851882436972..comments2023-11-02T01:20:32.436-07:00Comments on The Forbidden Gospels: Recovering the ShardsApril DeConickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06616757055618151612noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6536854065433425156.post-48068810583443408942007-04-05T08:27:00.000-07:002007-04-05T08:27:00.000-07:00Yes, "gelassu" is correct.Yes, "gelassu" is correct.April DeConickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06616757055618151612noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6536854065433425156.post-58551789579323486832007-04-05T07:16:00.000-07:002007-04-05T07:16:00.000-07:00If I understand her correctly, I think that Dr DeC...If I understand her correctly, I think that Dr DeConick means that Paul provides information about the history of early Christianity, not the historical Jesus. Surely no one can argue with this claim. Whether or not he ever met Jesus, Paul definitely played a role in early Church history.gdelassuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11107851777800250317noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6536854065433425156.post-62253098108688087092007-04-04T16:26:00.000-07:002007-04-04T16:26:00.000-07:00Paul never met Jesus... so why take his version as...Paul never met Jesus... so why take his version as 'gospel'? <BR/><BR/><BR/>John Noyce<BR/>http://historye.blogspot.comJohn Noycehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02966033772994457851noreply@blogger.com