tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6536854065433425156.post415614319941534600..comments2023-11-02T01:20:32.436-07:00Comments on The Forbidden Gospels: Book Note: Das Thomas-Evangelium. Einleitung - Zur Frage des historischen Jesus - Kommentierung aller 114 Logien (Reinhard Nordsieck)April DeConickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06616757055618151612noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6536854065433425156.post-2679391935717720622007-05-16T06:51:00.000-07:002007-05-16T06:51:00.000-07:00In the Gospel, Jesus is a blatant later addition....In the Gospel, Jesus is a blatant later addition. If Thomas (the twin) is an adjective for Judas in the Coptic gospel, it is only possible to reconstruct the historical prophet by reference to Judas.geoffhudson.blogspot.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14724916983698195467noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6536854065433425156.post-31442637964697151802007-05-15T18:52:00.000-07:002007-05-15T18:52:00.000-07:00"In fact, he doesn't think that a good reconstruct...<I>"In fact, he doesn't think that a good reconstruction of the historical Jesus or New Testament theology is possible without reference to Thomas."</I><BR/><BR/>I agree with that. Certainly no treatment of Jesus that leaves out Thomas can be called complete.Alan Gregory Wonderwheelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00186755261777539572noreply@blogger.com