tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6536854065433425156.post6250663540712364944..comments2023-11-02T01:20:32.436-07:00Comments on The Forbidden Gospels: Apocryphote of the Day: 4-10-08April DeConickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06616757055618151612noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6536854065433425156.post-49722713418463928052008-04-19T17:01:00.000-07:002008-04-19T17:01:00.000-07:00Possible flaw in the argument -- The questions put...Possible flaw in the argument -- The questions put to the demon in the apocryphote must still be answered: "How did you acquire knowledge concerning the hidden mysteries of the height?" And, "Why then should you not tremble, when you speak the mysteries of the height?" So a.) how does a demon, if he is a demon, learn of God's secrets, and b.) Why does a demon, if he is a demon, not worry and tremble knowing about his ultimate demise?Roadscholarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17671332369325416170noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6536854065433425156.post-56259696922778351992008-04-11T06:24:00.000-07:002008-04-11T06:24:00.000-07:00Today's apocryphote definately adds to your case. ...Today's apocryphote definately adds to your case. I'm wondering what the impact would have been at the Codex Judas Conference. Gregor Wurst made his argument that we know of no Gnostic texts in wich the reciever of revelation is the antagonist of the tale. But I feel that this part of Acts of Andrew is contesting this. That being said, I know not much about the Acts of Andrew. I will surely look further into that. Thanks April. Funny how luck also plays a part in scholarly work.Christian Nielsenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02702629733270914697noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6536854065433425156.post-31237052556822411282008-04-10T18:12:00.000-07:002008-04-10T18:12:00.000-07:00Nick,Be sure to send me an abstract to post as a s...Nick,<BR/><BR/>Be sure to send me an abstract to post as a student thesis!April DeConickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06616757055618151612noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6536854065433425156.post-27752583903739950012008-04-10T13:30:00.000-07:002008-04-10T13:30:00.000-07:00I am arguing in my master's thesis (due in a few w...I am arguing in my master's thesis (due in a few weeks!) that in Mark, the bad part about knowing the mysteries is not who knows them, but who is willing to reveal them to the wrong people at the wrong time, which is the role I think the demons play in Mark.Nick Kigerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10874506643442301688noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6536854065433425156.post-2107232207281336072008-04-10T13:26:00.000-07:002008-04-10T13:26:00.000-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Nick Kigerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10874506643442301688noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6536854065433425156.post-26181393177310272132008-04-10T09:41:00.000-07:002008-04-10T09:41:00.000-07:00This text certainly helps your case. What do you ...This text certainly helps your case. What do you make of Wurst's contention that only insiders (i.e., Gnostics) participate in dialogues with Jesus in Gnostic texts? Do you know of any exceptions?David Creechhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09480313754533255555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6536854065433425156.post-74712705201304531972008-04-10T09:18:00.000-07:002008-04-10T09:18:00.000-07:00Good point. Similarly, in the canonical Gospels, ...Good point. Similarly, in the canonical Gospels, it is always the demons that know who Jesus really is, often identifying him openly as the "holy one of God." It is the demons that Jesus charges to keep silent about him.<BR/><BR/>And it is the disciples who, until later, keep wondering who Jesus is.Memrahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00576135299193837482noreply@blogger.com