data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaf59/eaf59bed3f8ac6f075e899d7fa6128aa1b8e1b51" alt=""
The book is set up in a way that allows for a case-by-case examination of each piece of evidence. This is a wonderful procedure because it allows for each passage, document or inscription to be evidence for its own time and place, leaving open sociological and geographical variations. All the texts are recorded in full in the first half of the book. Each is introduced by a handy guide, telling where the original is published, what translation is used, date, provenance, original language, and short bibliography. What follows each text is Donaldson's commentary. The texts are grouped in these categories: Scripture/LXX/Apocrypha; Pseudepigrapha; Qumran; Philo; Josephus; Greco-Roman Literature; Early Christian Literature; Inscriptions.
Part 2 is a dedicated discussion of the evidence culled from Part 1. So Donaldson has a chapter each on Sympathization; Conversion; Ethical Monotheism; Participation in Eschatological Salvation.
In the end, Donaldson argues that Christianity's globalization of its religion is not a unique development of Christianity. It is firmly based in a universalism already at work in Judaism.
2 comments:
Such a broad-brush work must inevitably be superficial, never arriving at the real history which was 'water under the bridge' by the time the extant documents were written in their "own time and place".
It certainly sounds like a good book. I hope to read it soon. The evidence has always been there. I have been arguing the same for years. I could not tell from your brief description if Donaldson mentions this, but high on the list of evidence should be Acts frequent references to the gentile God-fearers. They were Paul's first major gentile audience. The only other scholars I have found who make a point of Judaism's openness to the gentile world are John Gager and Krister Stendahl. Without this, Christianity could not have developed as it did. But while Judaism's appeal to gentiles was an advantage at first for the Jesus movement, it would soon turn into an obstacle when the Church came to regard Judaism's openness as competition. Marcel Simon made a point of that, if I recall.
Leon Zitzer
Post a Comment