Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Encratism

So today I am thinking and writing about encratism, a severe form of asceticism that did not even allow for marriage since it was conceived to be a state of sin. It is a strange phenomenon in the early church, and it looks to me like it was there from as early as we can track the church because the Corinthian correspondence lends me to believe that Paul was addressing these issues already. I hope to explore Tatian today.

10 comments:

dev2lyzbpz said...

Dear April,

Very interesting subject!
Encratism was there even before 'Christianity' and so before the First Century. Nevertheless the whole Latin virginitas stemmed from it as welle as Syrian ascetism. Much success with the research and writing!

Boudewijn Koole-Huibregtse, Driebergen, Holland

展姍展姍 said...

Gods mill grinds slow but sure. ....................................................

Stephan Huller said...

You can't meaningfully explore the tradition without taking a stand on the claim that Titian (or Tatian as he is known in the West) was apostatized from Justin's teachings. Of course the orthodox claim is garbage but so many writers avoid taking a stand on the probability of this statement in Irenaeus that what follows in their discussion is ultimately meaningless. Once we stop maligning Tatian's implicit claim things start to get interesting. The claim that Justin was just like us - i.e. thoroughly orthodox - seem far more suspect. I suspect that Hippolytus's Justin (Justinus) might well have been the real Justin of history ...

Megaan said...

Excellent blog.

Fancy the content I have seen so far and I am your regular reader of your blog.

I follow your blog and i like your way of posting.

I have added http://forbiddengospels.blogspot.com/ in my blog http://news-updations.blogspot.com/.

I am pleased to see my blog in your blog list.

Hope to see a positive reply.

Thanks for visiting my blog as well !

Waiting for your reply friend !!!!!

judyrod said...

Subtlety is better than force. ............................................................

Geoff Hudson said...

What do you think this meant?

"I wish that all men were as I am."
1 Cor. 7:7.

Geoff Hudson said...

Did the writer mean he wished all men were married?

MinB2139 said...

85成人片免費看 視訊交友vino 一夜情情色聊天 免費觀看影片 視訊交友中心 免費最新女優影片 性感走光照片 免費線上看成人影片 辣妹偷拍貼圖 男女聊天室 愛愛天堂 情趣內衣寫真 18禁成人影城 少女辣妹遊戲18 洪爺影城av 成人卡通a片 情色+貼圖 色情貼圖區 一夜情網站, 383成人 完美女人影音視訊 live 秀 玩美女人國 性感絲襪美女 辣妹交友 人妻自拍裸體 熟南熟女聊天室 a片下載 免費視訊聊天室 a圖裸體女生 天天看正妹美女寫真館 85cc成人長片 免費a片 嘟嘟 997770 台灣情色貼圖 一夜情買援交妹 情人視訊網 鋼管秀視訊 av網站 辣妹自拍 大奶辣妹照片 sex 85cc影片 日本巨乳寫真下載 情色性愛圖貼 後宮電影院 限制級 0204交友 日本性愛影片 洪爺走光自拍照片圖片

Geoff Hudson said...

1 Cor. 1:8 has "Now to the unmarried", implying that the text immediately before applied to the married, i.e. the writer. The "as I am" at the end of 1:8 is a later edit, as is the "as I am" of verse 7 which was originally: "I wish that all men were married". Verse 8then follows quite naturally. And we are into a Jewish story.

Geoff Hudson said...

"Paul" may well be addressing the "issues" but as an editor of an existing text.